After seeing the topic of this article, I expect one of three things from you: either consult your dictionary if you have one handy like I do always; or click the link of the article hoping to learn a new word today like I always try to do; or finally, if you do not belong to any of the foregoing categories, click the link because you wish to know the position of the law regarding necrophilia
Whichever is your lot, welcome on board because some days ago, I fell in all of the categories when I first saw the word on a video uploaded by Pulse TV on social media. I consulted my dictionaries to learn a new word and then set out on a voyage of worthwhile discovery to know the position of the law on something as disgusting, yet real as this. The outcome of my discovery is this article you are reading. 

Firstly, necrophilia is a pathological attraction to dead bodies, especially sexual attraction or intercourse. Another dictionary of mine defines it as sexual interest in dead bodies. Now, you may wonder what my fascination is with the word that spurred an article. It’s simple. The video of the Ghanaian morgue attendant who confessed to such debased act ended with the question: “is there any law against this shameful act?” As a lawyer, that whetted my legal appetite and spurred my interest in researching on the subject, as Lord Denning, the Master of Rolls said, “God forbid that a lawyer knows all the law, but a good lawyer is one who knows where to find the law.”

However, before we go on, it is pertinent to ask, who in their right senses sleep with or have sexual interest in dead bodies? If you say it may be for ritual purposes, I won’t dispute. Our society is yet to be fully divorced from crude practices. But if it is not for such, then the most reasonable explanation for people who do such is this: “aye n se won”, with the cannot-do-justice-to-the-real-meaning interpretation of “they are under a spell.” 

It didn’t take me much time to find out that apart from the fact that necrophilia might be a pathological disorder or might have a spiritual connotation, it is a crime and it is outlawed by the Criminal Code Act of Nigeria which applies only in the Southern part of the country. Sadly, there is no equivalent provision in the Penal Code, the operative legislation in the North. Section 242(1) (b) of the Criminal Code provides as follows:

Any person who without lawful justification or excuse, the proof of which lies on him, improperly or indecently interferes with, or offers any indignity to any dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not is guilty of a misdemeanor and is liable to imprisonment for two years.”

A cursory look at this provision shows that sleeping with dead bodies is not the only act contemplated by this provision of the law. In actual fact, it is the opinion of a colleague that the legislators may not even have contemplated “sleeping with dead bodies” due to the paucity of specificity in this provision. For instance, a comparative look at the provision for the offence of rape shows otherwise. Section 357 of the same Act provides that: 

Any person who has unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman or girl, without her consent, or with her consent, if the consent is obtained by force or by means of threats or intimidation of any kind, or by fear of harm, or by means of false and fraudulent representation as to the nature of the act, or, in the case of a married woman, by personating her husband, is guilty of an offence which is called rape” (emphasis mine).

This provision on rape is explicit and specific, especially with the highlighted words above as touching having “unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman or girl.” However, it is not unsafe to interpret, it violates no interpretation rule and it is obviously right that “improper or indecent interference or offering of any indignity” referred to in section 242(1) (b) of the Act covers the subject of this article. In actual fact, Black’s Law Dictionary, Tenth Edition, defines “indecency” as the quality, state, or condition of being outrageously offensive, especially in a vulgar or sexual way.

Away from that, I have two grouses against this provision. Firstly, the statement, “without lawful justification or excuse”, means that the drafters of the legislation might have envisaged a situation where a necrophiliac would have a lawful excuse for engaging in such act. The question is, which lawful justification would a human have for sleeping with dead bodies? I’m yet to come up with one. Though in another way round, a lawful justification for improper or indecent interference or offer of any indignity to any dead human body might be in the form of a pathologist performing autopsy, but definitely not sleeping with a dead body.

Secondly, the punishment of two years seems like a slap on the wrist for offenders. Imagine mourning the death of a loved one and some debased humans somewhere are sexually feasting on the body. Two years is definitely not commensurate with this inconceivable and unimaginable act but I am far from surprised. The same Criminal Code Act prescribes the ludicrous punishment of N100 for some offences, yet we still have lawmakers in the hallowed chambers.

Definitely, morgue attendants would be much more prone to such an ungodly and unhuman act, but it is better to seek help or flee, like the Bible commands, than be a necrophiliac and even a proud one like the Ghanaian morgue attendant. What can be worse than sexual intercourse with a dead body?

If you sleep with dead bodies, you are toying with two years behind bars. But wait, who would even arrest and prosecute you? Everybody would think you dine with the devil himself.

S.O.J. Fadipe, Esq. 

Fadipe is a young lawyer currently practicing in Benin City, Edo State.

You can connect with him via Twitter and Instagram: @inspiredsunfad; and or



  1. The term isn’t a very common one, as you alluded to in your opening statements. Thus, you can haphazardly guess that it’s a rare case in the courtroom. Being a necrophiliac and going scot free in Nigeria is two pronged. Legally, it’s possible as not many people have heard the term before, not to talk of knowing that it’s a crime. Ethically, he might not escape as he’s likely to be relieved of his job and be advised to see a shrink.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Indisputably, it’s a rare case in the courtroom. However, did you mean legally it’s possible to go scot free? If so, I also agree. As long as there’s an element of reasonable doubt which will be resolved in favor of the accused person. However, if the basis for going scot free is because not many people have heard the term before, I disagree in all its totality. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. There are many laws in our Law books that even as a lawyer I don’t know but ignorance won’t avail me.
      The conclusion of the article is on the ethical side and on a lighter note, but it still does not mean the law will abdicate its responsibility.

      Thanks for your comment!


      1. I’m not saying that when the case reaches the court, the accused would be set free because he pleads ignorance. Far from it! I know very well that ignorance of the law is no excuse. What I mean is that if a necrophiliac is caught by colleagues or neighbours, they might not even go to the police to report as they might not know that it’s against the law of the land. That’s what I mean by the necrophiliac going scot free. They’re more likely to send him to a shrink.


      2. Ok then. One of the purposes of this article is enlightenment. Now you know that Necrophilia is against the law. So, report your neighbor if he or she is a culprit…lol. I understand your point bro. Thanks 👍


  2. Esohe

    I ran for my dictionary when I saw the word. Imagine how I laughed at myself when I read the 3 expected reactions.

    But really that kind thing! Toh… It’s no news that our laws need to be reviewed to be more realistic in terms of fines, punishments, range of crimes that can be committed.

    Thank you for educating us with this post

    Liked by 1 person

  3. This is a nice article though the topic is not a common one in this part of the world. When I first saw the topic I was tempted to argue that the offence might fall within the provisions for unnatural ofences (as contained in section 214 of Criminal Code Act) but a look at the statute eliminated such argument as that was obviously not contemplated by the drafters of the law… Thank you for bringing consciousness to the omission of commensurate punishment for the unimaginable act in C.C, hopefully the legislature will do justice to this soon enough… Good Article

    Liked by 1 person

  4. No doubt, I looked the word up in the dictionary. Lool

    I also think the Legislators that drafted Section 242(1)b of the Criminal Code must have had the ritualists who take out body parts of the dead to carry out their fetish practices, little wonder the Penal Code is silent on it – corpses over there do not spend hours in the morgue!

    Hopefully, like you said, our Legislators would wake one day and see the lapses in our laws.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Baron, you’re right. Fetish practices must have been in their contemplations but definitely not the only thing. And the issue of same provision not covered by the Penal Code, that’s true. I didn’t even think of it in that way. The absence of the provision is because they are mostly Muslims and they bury their dead humans as soon as possible. I’m planning to write a sequel, I should put this.
      Now concerning our legislators, it’s a shame that there are lawyers also in those Chambers and we still have ridiculous legislations gallivanting. God help us. May things get better one day.

      Thanks for your comment bro! 👍

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s